Greens ready to collaborate with anyone who wants to fight against global warming
Three months into the federal election, Elizabeth May, leader of the Green Party of Canada, says she hopes to see a minority government come to power and influence her education.
S ccording to her, holding the balance of power, green succeed in bringing the Conservatives to abandon their fierce opposition to tax carbon emissions if, for them, this opened the doors of power.
“You can change your mind by looking at the power dynamics in the House of Commons. We can think that the elimination of carbon taxes is not a good idea if the only way to be prime minister is to maintain them, “said Ms. May.
The Greens have never held the balance of power at the federal level, but it has already happened on a provincial level. In British Columbia, the three seats held by the Greens allow John Horgan’s NDP to govern. In New Brunswick, the minority Conservative government can turn to the Greens or the People’s Alliance MPs – a right-wing formation – to get support in a crucial vote.
In Prince Edward Island, the Greens have even been the official opposition since last spring’s election. This is the best election result ever obtained by Canadian environmentalists.
Keep in mind that the Green Party was able in May to elect one of its own, Paul Manly, in a federal by-election in the riding of Nanaimo-Ladysmith, British Columbia.
Support to offer
Ms. May says she can support a minority government from any party, but she has one condition: we will have to take real action to end climate change.
“We will negotiate with anyone, we will talk to everyone, but we will not compromise on climate action,” she says.
Last week, Ms. May was on a Canadian tour last winter, meeting with voters in Barrie, southern Ontario. She refuses to say that these meetings are partisan gatherings, preferring to talk about “community meetings”. Nevertheless, she admits that she finds it very pleasant to be greeted by people waving green signs and chanting: “We love you Elizabeth!”
Ms. May believes that a new fervor favors her party. She hopes that it will not fade on the day of the vote.
Nik Nanos, founder of Nanos Research, says greens still run the risk of voting collapsing on polling day as voters tend to turn to the party with the strongest chance of victory. .
“The Green Party seems to be a haven for progressive liberals and disaffected New Democrats,” he says. If the Conservatives have a chance to win, the support for the Greens could return, despite their goodwill and that of their leader, to the Liberals. ”
According to him, the dream scenario for Ms. May and the Greens is that Canadians do not believe in the election of a majority government and that they want more environmentalists in the House of Commons.
Ms. May is not so direct.
“It’s really important to explain to Canadians how our democracy works, to tell them that a minority Parliament is the best solution if, and it’s a big deal, parties and elected officials are committed to working together.”
By “working together”, it specifically addresses the fight against climate change by adopting policies that will significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, by not building new pipelines and replacing fossil fuels with renewable energies as quickly as possible. as possible.
But already the specter of division revolves around training.
Quebec Green Party leader Alex Tyrrell petitioned three weeks ago to denounce May’s intentions to use Canadian oil for several years and even invest in bitumen processing plants Alberta. According to this petition, these projects are not commensurate with the dynamic struggle against climate change.
A number of candidates have signed this petition. Mr Tyrrell has already announced that he will vote for the Federal Greens, although he is disappointed by Ms May’s position.
The Federal Chief rejects Mr Tyrrell’s criticism and denies that signatories are among the candidates of his party, which is why she is wrong.
Cass Romyn in the riding of Sturgeon River-Parkland, Alberta has signed this petition. It defends itself by saying that it should not be given too much importance. The Greens are genuine Democrats and differences of opinion are not a bad thing, she argues.