G7 in Charlevoix: Trudeau had an alternative statement
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had in his pocket an additional closing statement at last year’s G7 summit, in the event that US President Donald Trump would block the usual communique, the main Canadian organizer said.
The e senator Peter Boehm was the sherpa Trudeau, the official who organized the G7 leaders meeting in Charlevoix last year and describes the unprecedented efforts to deal with potential disruptions from Mr. Trump at this meeting in an article in the French newspaper “Politique étrangère”.
Mr. Boehm retired from the public service three months after the summit, which ended with a tirade of Mr. Trudeau’s insults to Mr. Trudeau on Twitter and the withdrawal of his support for the media release. Mountain peak.
Last September, Mr. Trudeau appointed Mr. Boehm an independent senator after a long diplomatic career that included ambassador and deputy minister positions in Ottawa.
In preparing for the G7 last year, it was no secret that the government was concerned that Mr. Trump was a disruptive force.
Trudeau is expected to attend this year’s leaders meeting later this month in France, and French officials are scrambling to make the summit a success – with or without the cooperation of Trump.
Boehm explains in his 11-page essay the need for an effective G7 to tackle global issues with consensus among its member countries, including Britain, Germany, Japan and Italy.
According to Dr. Boehm, the main disadvantage of using this method in an organization like the G7 is that a non-cooperative member can spoil the desired and defended results of others.
Usually, the final communiqué, a statement that Sherpas carefully craft for their leaders, is the G7’s primary means of showing “its unity and leadership to the world,” said Boehm.
But Canada did not take anything for granted at last year’s summit.
Mr. Boehm writes that the choice at the Canadian summit in Charlevoix was whether or not to try to negotiate a communiqué.
That there were “profound differences” between the Americans – Mr. Boehm never names Mr. Trump -, the other six countries and the European Union (also a member of the G7) on several issues, did -he declares. Issues to be addressed included climate change, order based on international rules, protectionism in trade and the nuclear deal between Iran and the Western powers, from which Mr. Trump has since withdrawn the United States .
Finally, the decision was made to engage in a communiqué, but with a kind of Plan B.
The Sherpas and Prime Minister Trudeau agreed that efforts should be made to negotiate a communiqué, and that the publication of the Chair’s summary could be an alternative if the search for consensus proved futile. Canadians have kept a spare statement at hand, just in case, notes Boehm.
The leaders mounted a final decisive effort, alongside their sherpas, and after a night marathon session, a statement was adopted.
Hard work collapsed after Trump, who left early, wrote on Twitter, from Air Force One, that Trudeau was “very dishonest and weak” after the Prime Minister resumed his criticism of US fares. steel and aluminum at its closing press conference. Trump also said he was withdrawing his support for the statement.
John Kirton, an expert on the G7 summits at the University of Toronto, said he was not expecting Mr. Trump to pose the same threat to French President Emmanuel Macron in Biarritz, France this month -this.
There will be no consensus on climate change, as Mr Macron, as host, will not accept any cuts in support of the Paris climate agreement that Mr Trump has disavowed, M said. Kirton. The United States and the rest of the G7 will simply have to agree to disagree, he added.